Following the decision that came down from 2021’s NCAA v. Alston, collegiate athletes can now profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL) as they participate in sports.  This classifies these student athletes as pro-am (professional amateurs) and allows them to earn non-scholarship income across every division of collegiate sports.  The fallout following this decision has left many questions left to be answered, ranging from the tax implications of this earned income to the philosophical question of whether amateur athletics can still exist.
 
Our culture has already had a questionable relationship with collegiate athletics and the concept of student athletes.  Scholastic athletics (at all levels) were designed to be extensions of the classroom and provide a practicum of learning using concepts like competition and teamwork as the catalyst.  Scholarships were offered as compensation for the athletic services of a young athlete; in other words, the school gives the student a free education (and room and board) in return for playing a sport or sports for the institution (and thus growing the reputation of the school thanks to the publicity of having such a talented athlete).  And yet, prior to the opening of the flood gates with NIL monies, fans consumed college sports in ways that went beyond school spirit:  sports like college football and basketball were heavily monetized thanks to the constant national broadcasting of games.  There are now more sponsored college football bowl games than there are teams with winning records.  Media members analyze these games like the participants were veteran professionals and not inexperienced kids.  And the betting and wagering has practically flipped off any remaining statute that claims it is illegal.
 
With this new dynamic in college sports, it’s only a matter of time before society comes to its senses and realizes that the principles of amateur athletics have dissipated into oblivion.  One might imagine that these student athletes pay no attention to their studies or other scholastic responsibilities regarding their education.  But the gun-slinging will get even dirtier once institutions and collectives discover their limitless amounts of money that can be used to persuade a student athlete to transfer from one school to another on the promise of more compensation.  Unlike professional sports, we currently do not have contracts or salary caps to govern the business of these pro-am athletes, especially under the guise of higher education.
 
However, the pinnacle of this monstrosity resides at the top of the individual athletic departments that oversee these programs.  When athletic directors become as boisterous as the rowdy fans in attendance and forget their primary responsibility as the adults who are responsible for the education of these kids, it’s easy to see how college athletics have fully mutated into a bastardized minor league affiliate for the professional sports they feed.
 
Take Mark Harlan as an example.  The athletic director at the University of Utah, he came under fire when he made public comments about the officiating during a football game between Utah and BYU at the end of 2024.  The comments referenced how Utah’s loss was the result of the game being “stolen” due to calls made by the officials.  The Big 12 promptly fined Harlan $40,000 for his remarks.
 
A few months later, Kirby Hocutt became the next poster child.  The athletic director at Texas Tech, he made public comments about the officials’ decision to eject one of his star players from a basketball game due to a flagrant foul that did not appear to be intentional.  Hocutt’s comments did not appear to be as demonstrative as Harlan’s, which explains why there was no news regarding a hefty fine.  However, it doesn’t negate the fact that Hocutt felt it was necessary to make public comments about a call in a college basketball game that could have been kept private instead of looking to discredit the officials in the game.  (By the way, he made the comments publicly while the game was still happening.)
 
The question is not whether the person at the top of the hierarchy can hold or express an opinion normally reserved for a fan.  The question instead concerns the fact that the people at the top of the hierarchy might have forgotten their prime responsibility in the equation:  to steward the education of student athletes through the medium of sports, and thus setting the example for the players, coaches, parents, and fans to do the same.  Sports at all levels and in all forms come with tough breaks, and the lessons to be learned from them concern the athlete’s ability to overcome them, not to complain about them.  It’s no coincidence that the athletic directors have resorted to this behavior in a culture where the money in college sports has become weaponized.  After all, maybe a star athlete would be easily persuaded to take more money at another school if his ego gets hurt when the athletic director tells the student athlete to respect the officials, the coaches, and the other adults in the room.
 
Obviously, these two examples are not the sole times that athletic directors at colleges have spouted off in ways that draw negative attention or fines.  But they are two very recent examples in a world where college sports have become a new business filled with potential mercenaries.  In a capitalist society where social influencers, athletes, and other celebrities can (and have the right to) garner more attention and wealth than the hard-working people who grind each day to earn a living and provide for families, the least these administrators can do is temper their overzealous fandom and put their blessings in perspective.  However, the opposite may be more disastrous:  not acting inappropriately could result in the loss of future stars, sponsorship monies, and one’s job.
 
What’s more important:  the morals or the money?

The recent tragic deaths of NHL All-Star Johnny Gaudreau and his brother Matthew on a rural road in southern New Jersey at the hands of an apparent drunk driver have triggered an outpouring of grief from the hockey community, the sports world at large, and politicians in both the United States and Canada.  For many fans, this served as a stark reminder:  the superstar athletes we watch, support, criticize, and praise are, at their core, human beings.

Growing up in Carneys Point, New Jersey, Johnny and Matthew were giants in the South Jersey hockey scene before leaving to play at Boston College.  Following graduation, Matthew played in the minor leagues for several years before becoming a coach.  At the time of his death, he was the head coach of the hockey team at Gloucester Catholic High School, the alma mater he shared with Johnny.

While at BC, Johnny won the Hobey Baker Award, the college hockey equivalent of the Heisman Trophy, before signing with the NHL’s Calgary Flames.  Over eight seasons in Calgary, he racked up impressive individual numbers, won the Lady Byng Trophy for sportsmanship in 2017, and placed fourth in league MVP voting in 2022.   He was named an NHL All-Star in six of his eight seasons while playing for the Flames.

After the 2021-22 season and with an expiring contract, Johnny faced an important decision.  He was a highly coveted free agent, and many wondered whether he would stay in Calgary or seek a fresh start elsewhere.  In the end, Johnny took a pay cut to sign with the Columbus Blue Jackets, a move that left many fans confused, incredulous, and even angry.  Calgary Flames fans were upset that he had left for what they perceived to be an inferior team.  Despite writing a heartfelt letter of thanks to Calgary, Flames fans showered him with boos the first time he touched the puck upon his return as a visiting player.

Hockey and money weren’t the only factors influencing Johnny’s decision to leave Calgary, a place he once called his “second home.”  He and his wife agreed that Columbus, Ohio, would be a great place to raise a family.  Further, they wanted to be within driving distance of their parents and siblings (especially after Johnny and Matthew’s father, Guy, suffered a heart attack in 2018).  Like anyone else switching jobs or moving to a new city, Johnny and his wife had to figure out the best overall fit for their family.

On August 29, 2024, Johnny and Matthew Gaudreau were pronounced dead at the scene of their accident after being struck by an alleged drunk and aggressive driver while riding their bikes near their parents’ home in New Jersey.  They had returned to their old stomping grounds because they were supposed to be groomsmen for their sister’s wedding scheduled for the next day.  Tributes from around the world flooded the news and social media.  Fans of the Flames and Blue Jackets made makeshift memorials outside their respective home arenas.  People who knew the two brothers spoke of their good character, noting how they were both great teammates and friends.  Hockey fans, many of whom had chastised and mocked Johnny’s free agency decision just two years prior, came together to pay tribute to two men who, by all accounts, made everyone around them better people.  Suddenly, all the talk of free agency, career stats, wins and losses, good teams versus bad teams, etc., seemed meaningless.

Johnny left behind a wife and two children, while Matthew was set to become a father for the first time in a few months. A GoFundMe page was set up to support Matthew’s wife and their soon-to-be-born son, and it far surpassed the initial goal of $30,000.  To add to the heartbreak, Sean Monahan, Johnny’s former teammate and best friend from his days in Calgary, recently signed with the Blue Jackets largely to reunite on the ice with his friend.  Now, that reunion will never happen.

It can be easy to get caught up in the fantasy of professional sports and to see athletes as pieces of a puzzle or tradable commodities.  It’s natural to feel frustrated when a team you support fails to acquire a big-name free agent, and it’s easy to feel angry when the face of a franchise leaves for what they see as greener pastures.  But we must remember that these athletes are first and foremost people.  They’re just trying to do what’s best for themselves and their families.  Hopefully, it doesn’t take another tragedy to put this into perspective.

The way people have come together to pay tribute to two brothers has been touching.  These were great men who just happened to be great hockey players.  But while we honor the dead, let’s also be respectful of peoples’ choices while they’re living.

If you caught any part of the Women's College World Series this year, you might have caught this clip.  During a game between UCLA and Texas A&M, a double steal led to an assistant coach bumping an umpire and receiving a two game suspension along with her ejection.

The play?  It's the old "runners on 1st and 3rd" scenario where the runner on first base has to get caught in a rundown long enough for the runner at third to score.  However, the defense didn't get a single out on the play.  The runner on first got caught, the runner on third scored, and the runner from first ended up at third.

Lisa Fernandez, the UCLA first base coach, argued over a lack of an obstruction call.  You know the rest of the story.

What's really crazy, though, is that the story doesn't stop after Fernandez gets ejected and suspended.  UCLA head coach Kelly Inouye-Perez actually supported Fernandez and praised her, claiming she had no problem with what she did and discussed how it added to her team's chemistry.

Yeah, one of those...

Both coaches in question apparently forgot that they are actually educators who are responsible for these young ladies.  And that's a crime.

Actually, that's a metaphoric crime.  Assaulting an umpire may be an actual crime.

Referee Magazine publishes a supplement to the NCAA Baseball Rules prior to each season.  The 2017 supplement began with a cover story titled "Respect and Integrity."  It was their way to enforce the importance of reducing the number of conflicts within the sport.

The cover included a graphic that discussed the number of ejection/suspension reports submitted during the 2016 season.  Of note from that graphic:

• 38% (264 of 693) of the reports came from Division I baseball, which lead the sport.
  
• The most reports came from head coaches in Division I with 141.  The second most came from players in Division I with 100.
  
• Head coaches and players were almost equally reported in Division II and III.
  
• Division III players actually eclipsed their respective head coaches in reports (98 vs. 89).
  
• Division III assistant coaches lead all assistant reports with 30.
  

So where do we start?

How about with the 693 reports???  That means that 693 times in an environment that is supposed to be promoting the educational experience of the student-athlete did a report have to be filed regarding a disqualification and pending suspension.  If that happened in a nursery school, the local town would be quarantined.

Beyond the graphic, the article discussed how umpires and coaches need to work together to make sure the integrity of the game is met.  However, the graphic discussing the submitted reports shows that this is not necessarily the case.  If there was a handful of issues reported, it would be different.  But preaching this type of relationship when the statistics show differently reeks of the NCAA only paying this idea lip service.

And by the way, it's Referee Magazine that is publishing this article.  How many coaches and players read this?

The fact of the matter is that collegiate athletics still don't understand that they aren't the pros.

Back in March, an interesting incident happened that appeared to be five years in the making.

Following a college softball game between Florida and Auburn, Auburn shortstop Haley Fagan got into a shoving/screaming match with Florida coach Tim Walton during the handshake line.  Apparently, as Fagan led the line for her team, when she reached the end of the Florida line to see Walton, she put her hand down to not shake his hand, resulting in Walton's hand slap going into Fagan's shoulder.  When Fagan turned around, she then shoved Walton in the back to return the favor.  This eventually turned into some screaming where Fagan, not Walton, had to be restrained.

There is some history here.  In 2012, Walton had to dismiss three players from his team prior to the start of their NCAA tournament.  Two of them were Fagan's sisters, Sami and Kasey.  Apparently, it all stemmed from an altercation where specifics were not discussed.  However, Kevin Fagan, the father of all three girls and former defensive lineman for the San Francisco 49ers, spoke up back in 2012 about the issue and stated his girls would be transferring.

Ironically, Kasey Fagan and the third girl dismissed, Cheyenne Coyle, are both graduate assistants for Auburn.

Walton issued an apology shortly after the incident with Haley Fagan, stating it was never his intent to touch her in what was conceived to be a poor intent, but to just shake her hand as per the custom.  He even took responsibility and said he should have been more aware of what was happening.  Nothing was said from Fagan, Auburn, or the SEC around the same time.

There are a million potential factors at play here, all of which are based solely on the mere possibility of them occurring, not so much on any hard evidence.  It's tough to formulate opinions and garner suggestions when you're working only with connecting the dots of potential situations, especially when you're not a detective working to solve a case for the Special Victims Unit.  But it doesn't take a genius to see the writing on the wall at the same time.

The Fagan family has some grudges that will slowly turn into demons if they are not resolved.  I'm not sure if Walton has those demons.  He seems like he tried his best in all these situations.

The next question is whether or not this type of culture is rampant in that part of the country...

Back in February, an article and news story from the local news from Toledo summed up the plight of youth and high school athletics in a manner that couldn't be more perfect.

The thesis of the article submits that it is the parents who are the biggest culprit in destroying the institution of athletics for our youth, which is the absolute truth.  In fact, the only time this isn't the case is when you get a coach who has none of his/her children on the team he/she coaches, yet still is an absolute nightmare.

Why are the parents the problem?  It's three fold:

1. The players (who are all kids in high school or younger) are now preferring that their parents do NOT attend their games.  The parents put so much pressure on their kids that the kids no longer perform well, nor, and most importantly, do the kids have fun.  Parents think their kids must receive an athletic scholarship (as if they are owed it by God and/or society), so any call or decision that goes against the kid/team is the act of the devil.  Perhaps the parents are living vicariously through their children?
   
2. The college coaches who are scouting and recruiting high school kids to their programs are now pulling scholarship offers once they see how the parents act.  The article in question cites one Division I coach pulling a scholarship offer for a high school kid because the parents would be a cancer to the program.  If that's not the complete antithesis of what the parents want, I don't know what is.
   
3. The officials are retiring early or leaving the game in some form to escape the berating from parents that hold no merit.  It seems simplistic to say the game cannot be played without officials, but it's the truth.  Without officials, there is no game to play, and the kids lose.  To a different extent, without experienced or qualified officials, the officials assigned to the games may not be ready for certain assignments, which is just as bad as not playing due to a lack of officials.
   

The principle of this argument is very similar to that of a post we featured many moons ago when we transferred our material from our old blog.  Officials want to focus "between the lines," that is, on the playing action and not on the dugouts and stands.  When players, coaches, and fans berate officials, they take the focus of the official off the game and onto the unnecessary words and actions of people who do nothing but distract officials from doing their best job.  It seems the same principle applies to players who want to focus on the game, not their parents pressuring them.

All in all, it's real simple:  shut up.  Be nice.  Treat others how you would want to be treated.

Daniel Webster College is shutting down its Division III men's basketball program.  However, the final game for the team was marred by a brawl that resulted in three arrests.

Marquise Caudill, a guard for Daniel Webster's team, was arrested after assaulting an opponent by punching him and stomping on him while he was on the ground.  He further threatened an officer working security detail who tried to stop him.

His teammate, Antwaun Boyd, was also arrested for inciting the crowd that surrounded the officer who was trying to stop the fight.

A spectator, 43-year-old Elizabeth Morris, was also arrested for attempting to hold back the same officer from making the arrest.

Apparently, the officer in question requested backup and received the help of 25 other officers to attempt to restore order.

Sometimes, there are just no words for these types of situations.  You just shake your head and ask, "What were these people thinking?"  Or perhaps they weren't...

February 2 is Groundhog's Day, and it may be a pretty dumb holiday.  In fact, there are a lot of dumb holidays on our calendar...New Year's Eve/Day comes to mind.

But February 1 is actually an even dumber day in America  It's National Signing Day.

This is the day when all the star high school football players reveal which colleges they will attend in order to further their career as a football player.  High school kids have "reveal" events that they post on social media; they have press conferences; they basically are thrown into the spotlight with a production that is about as mature as trying to figure out the most unique way to ask a girl to the prom.

Someone is going to have to explain to me why we need this in our society.

I have constantly ripped those who use the exploitation of youth sports to further their goals.  I've been critical of events like the Little League World Series and why it needs to be broadcast nationally on ESPN.  This is just another example of the unnecessary junk we broadcast...and America eats it up.

It's bad enough that we are harming our youth and forcing them into adulthood with the big reveal of where they sign their letter of intent.  Their egos have already ballooned to the size of Montana.  They miss out on some of the joys of childhood and teenage years before adulthood hits them in the face with a biggest dose of reality they've experienced.  And as a culture, we can't get enough of everything related to college sports.  We are now dipping into high school sports on a national level and watching kids who may not even be legal adults yet commit to joining the college team to which we might pledge our allegiance.

Before you know it, we will be celebrating where 8th grade kids decide to go to high school...and then we'll be celebrating 6th grade kids deciding which sports they want to play...and then we'll be celebrating toddlers as they announce which elementary school they will attend...and then we'll be analyzing the decision of parents to conceive a child...and then we'll be dissecting whether or not two people in a marriage will work...

But with all that garbage being such a strong focus, National Signing Day also has one additional unique aspect to it that creates such a false sense of reality that it's time to burst the bubble.  The kids who are destined to go to college to play football, as well as their families and friends, are encompassed in a fake reality that this one special person who is announcing his collegiate intent will be the savior they all need to escape the doldrums of the average middle-class life.  It's as if their lives were nothing at all until they found this potential celebrity they could worship and pray that he returns with millions of dollars to divide among everyone in his entourage.  Both the kid and all around him use it as a day to bask in the glory of their opportunity to show the world that it's their turn to get a moment in the sun.  The ideas of personal responsibility and controlling your own destiny have become forgotten in the wake six degrees of separation from a kid who isn't even a celebrity...yet.

No wonder our culture is so messed up.

Back in January, an incident of unsportsmanlike conduct that occurred in a Division I basketball game rose to a level of ridiculousness that questions whether a coach even has a soul.

The background:  during the 2015-16 season, New Mexico assistant coach Terrence Rencher was trash-talking during a game between New Mexico and Colorado State.  The comments were directed at Colorado State forward Emmanuel Omogbo for unknown reasons.

Fast-forward to 2017 when the two teams met again.  Rencher picked up right where he left off, aiming derogatory and racially charged language at Omogbo during pregame warmups.  During the game, a skirmish erupted after a clean play was interpreted as dirty, especially since the game itself was somewhat tense and chippy.  Rencher and New Mexico assistant coach Chris Harriman were both ejected from the game for leaving the bench area during the skirmish.  (Harriman later apologized to Colorado State head coach Larry Eustachy for the incident.)

Following the game, Omogbo and Eustachy were walking from the arena to their cars and happened to pass by the New Mexico team bus where Rencher was standing.  Rencher picked up where he had left off, this time adding to his repertoire by rubbing the loss in Omogbo's face, which caused Omogbo to lose his temper and require restraint from Eustachy.

Following the departure of Omogbo and Eustachy to prevent things from escalating, Eustachy's wife, Lana, stepped in and reminded Rencher of the hardship Omogbo has experienced last year when his parents and two other family members were killed in a house fire.

What did Rencher do?  He laughed.

New Mexico head coach Craig Neal was asked about the incident, in which he defended Rencher via text message, claiming he did nothing wrong.

For the record, Rencher has a Bachelor's in Education with a focus on youth and community studies.  Rencher and his wife have two daughters.  Apparently, these credentials and the thought of having others treat his kids this way were not enough to stop him from acting in a way that only Satan would approve.

Maybe "again" isn't fair.  However, more often than not, these stories find themselves coming from the archives of youth, high school, or collegiate sports (or whatever you would consider anything that does not include the term "professional").

It's no secret I hold collegiate athletics in very low regard based on the way our society blindly devours the infinite issues they constantly feed us.  If you need another reason for this, examine the College Football Championship that took place at the beginning of January between Alabama and Clemson.

In short, this was a rematch of the same two teams from one year prior.  Alabama won last year, and they were looking to repeat and post an undefeated season.  They had also won four out of the last eight championships in the sport.

But this year, Clemson stunned them and walked away with a 35-31 victory in the final minute of the game.

Now, Clemson is no saint either.  Coach Dabo Swinney has done some pretty ridiculous things this year too.  But the point of this story is to call out Alabama for saying it was the fault of the officials they lost this game, rather than their ability to outplay their opponent.

Defensive back Hootie Jones went on record and was reported as the point-person regarding Alabama's opinion that the officials blew the game for them.  The ridiculous drivel he spewed was met with nothing more than normal, rational people chalking it up to him (and all of Alabama) being a sore loser.

Credit goes to Kevin Scarbinsky of Alabama.com for writing an article that stood up for morals:  Scarbinsky called out anyone who agreed with Jones and who actually thinks the officials were responsible for the loss.  And if you happen to scroll through the comments of that article, you'll note that there are a lot of people in this world that need their head examined.

The fact of the matter is that officials rarely, if ever, cost a team a victory.  For every one call that could subjectively have gone a different way, there are a plethora of events that truly affected the outcome of the game, which amount to whether or not the teams actually executed on the field of play.  For every questionable pass interference non-call, there was a false start that could have been avoided.  For every pitch just slightly outside the strike zone, there was a batter who couldn't move a runner over to score on a sacrifice fly.

The sign of a good sport is never blaming anyone else for a loss except yourself, even when you might think the game was taken from you due to a bad call.  You have the ability to overcome any obstacle, to train harder, to practice longer, and to be better than you were that day.  Make that known to the media and the public, rather than showing your immaturity.